The Truth cannot be displayed

The Truth you are looking for are currently unavailable. Your server might be experiencing technical difficulties, or you may need to adjust your media whores mandate.

Weapons of Mass Deception The Demolition of the American Dream

Spot the Boeing 757 in this picture   People still have eyeballs right ???Where IS the fucking plane at? I guess they figured they couldn't just leave it as it was since hardly anyone would believe that a Boeing 757 jet could slip through a hole just 2 or 3 meters wide). The photographic evidence suggests that it was a missile which struck the pentagon and not an 80 ton 757 boeing traveling at 250 M.P.H Can you find the aircraft's point of impact? Why in the name of Fuck are the windows still intact?  Where did 80 tons of 757 boeing go ? Do you see any areas of the lawn that indicate the release or presense of 19,000 gallons of burning jet fuel that would have spewed everywhere on impact ? Or the wing of the the goddamn plane that would have been sheared off on impact what are those firemen doing playing golf???

The Facts of the case on 911 to all you rush limbaud human paraquat motherfuckers.

1.

On 11 September Andrews had two squadrons of fighter jets with the job of protecting the skies over Washington D.C. They failed to do their job. Despite over one hour's advance warning of a terrorist attack in progress, not a single Andrews fighter took off (or scrambled) to protect the city. why?

Only one newspaper told the truth. That was the 'San Diego Union-Tribune':

"Air defense around Washington is provided mainly by fighter planes from Andrews Air Force Base in Maryland near the District of Columbia border. The D.C. Air National Guard is also based there and equipped with F-16 fighter planes, a National Guard spokesman said.

"But the fighters took to the skies over Washington only after the devastating attack on the Pentagon..."

Andrews Air Force Base is a huge installation. It hosts two 'combat-ready' squadrons:

* the 121st Fighter Squadron (FS-121) of the 113th Fighter Wing (FW-113), equipped with F-16 fighters;

* the 321st Marine Fighter Attack Squadron (VMFA-321) of the 49th Marine Air Group, Detachment A (MAG-49 Det-A), equipped with
F/A-18 fighters.

These squadrons are served by hundreds of full-time personnel.  but apparently they were all attending a bar mitzvah on that day. Andrews AFB had at least two 'combat-ready' squadrons 15 miles away from the pentagon So WHY did the executive branch and high-level military authorities DELIBERATELY order the air defense interceptors to STAND DOWN? NOBODY could have known that early in the proceedings that 'America was under attack"... or COULD they have known? OBVIOUSLY, those who ordered the stand-down DID know that early in the proceedings that "America was under attack" because they were COMPLICIT in the attack, and took ALL POSSIBLE STEPS to ENSURE that the attack WOULD TAKE PLACE, unimpeded by the air defense of the United States. True patriots in this land who have SWORN to protect and defend our Republic MUST consider these irrefutable FACTS and set about unswerevingly to bring these complicit individuals to justice.

 

2. If 19 Arabs hijacked the planes, why are there no Arabic names on any of the passenger lists?If they used non-Arabic aliases, which of the"innocents " on the lists are alleged to be the hijackers?

If they are alleged to have been using non-Arabic

aliases (19 obviously Arabic men got on board

using non-Arabic ID, with 100% success rate ?),

why did the FBI claim that they were traced through

the use of credit cards to buy tickets in their own

names?

If the mythical Arab hijackers really were on the

planes and airport security systems failed due

to incompetence (not once but 19 times!), where

is the major inquiry? I have seen bigger inquiries

into racehorse doping scandals.

 

 

 

If the above wasn't devastating enough, it's also an interesting fact to know that the Bin Laden family's private jet was the ONLY plane allowed to take off from the U.S. on Sept. 12th, 2001. I find it interesting that the family of the man we are blaming for the attacks is right here, right under our nose, and we let them go? I think they should have been questioned. Probably arrested and detained for helping fund Al Queda. But what did bush do? He allowed the Bin Laden family to be the only NON-military flight in the entire nation on Sept. 12. This stinks of high treason to me.They have spent $13 trillion tax dollars since the end of WWII on this military/intelligence complex, and it cannot protect its own headquarters? It can track every electronic communication on earth, crack the codes of the Al Quaeda in advance of 9-11, locate bin Laden's cell phone, but it can't decipher what it all means? And beyond that question is the more pertinent one hardly anyone is asking. * Bush clearly and undeniably had advance knowledge of a terrorist attack on US soil using planes as weapons by 9:05 am on September 11. * NORAD had it by 8:45 in an unprecedented simultaneous hijacking of four planes. * The Pentagon had it, as did everyone in DC by 9:05 as well. * The Pentagon began to evacuate the building, as did the White House and Capitol. * EVERYONE had advance knowledge of Flight 77 coming towards DC for 40 minutes.Yet, there was a complete defensive stand-down. Interceptors from distant Langley AFB took off late and flew at subsonic speeds to arrive 5 minutes too late. Planes from nearby Anacostia Naval Air Station, Andrews Air Force Base, and the 73rd Air Wing at Atlantic City, NJ never took off. Scramblers in the air already at 9:05 from Otis AFB turned to target Flight 77 and were called off, despite a formal shoot-down order from Bush/Cheney "moments after" the 9:05 crash -- which had ended any speculation of accident or coincidence or hijacking motives. By that moment they undeniably knew in advance what was coming and where it was headed. Local news announced that DC was the destination. Surface-to-air missiles at the White House and Pentagon remained sheathed in their silos. Despite the planes having turned off communications with ground control towers and their identifying transponders (which also shuts off their own near-range radar screens to avoid mid-air collisions), they were clearly visible to all external radars, they were being tracked by NORAD and DC towers, and they were somehow being navigated directly to their target. How were they allowed to come into the most restricted air space in the world with no challenge or defense? That is the question that answers both when Bush knew in advance and begs any rational response. The White House and Pentagon officials have been lying since day one about both advance intelligence knowledge that could have foiled the operation, and about their own ability to prevent, at least, the attack on the Pentagon. Let them answer that.

They are NOT introducing articles of impeachment now. They are only  TALLYING votes Sign Petition > George W. Bush Charged with High Treason for Complicity in the Attack of 911 FOR and AGAINST impeachment as of this moment.911was a diversionary tactic that everyone in this worthless fastfood culture accepted before the facts and embraced as a pretext for war. Which is why we have stone walling and no 9-11 investigation. The shuttle blew up. Immediately we have an investigation. A lear jet in florida flies off course it is intercepted by fighter jets within minutes.Heat from jet fuel fire alone would not cause towers to crumble.Fires do not destroy skyscrapers. Never in the history of steel frame structures has a single one been destroyed by fire.Airplane strikes do not destroy skyscrapers. A bomber strike to the Empire State Building during World War II did not harm that building. The World Trade Center towers were designed to survive a strike by a Boeing 707. The 767 is more massive, so the building was stressed near its design limits. But if a failure had occurred at that moment, it would have been at the point of highest levered stress, near the base of the tower, and the tower would have fallen over like a giant tree in a forest windstorm. That, of course, did not happen. And for the record WTC Twin Towers did not collapse they fell If it was a collapse it would follow the path of least resitence. It would crumble slowly at first building mommentum would meet great resitence and the collapse would spill out in ever direction Gravity goes in one direction down all things fall at the same speed regardless of weight According to the law of gravity, it is possible to calculate the time it takes for an object to fall a given distance. The equation is H=(1/2)at2, where H is the height, a is the acceleration of gravity (10 meters per second squared) and t is time in seconds. Plug in the height of the building at 1350 feet (411 meters) and we get 9 seconds. That is just about the length of time it took for the very top of the World Trade Center to fall to the street below. According to all reports, the whole thing was over in just about ten seconds. It is as if the entire building were falling straight down through thin air. As if the entire solid structure below, the strong part which had not been burned or sliced or harmed in any significant way, just disappeared into nothingness. Yet this (within a small tolerance) is what we would expect to find if there had been a controlled demolition, because the explosions below really do leave the upper stories completely unsupported. Like the Road Runner after he runs off the edge of the cliff, the entire building pauses a moment, then goes straight down.Any kind of viscous process or friction process should have slowed the whole thing down. Like dropping a lead ball into a vat of molasses, or dropping a feather into the air, gravitational acceleration cannot achieve its full effect if it is fighting any opposing force. In the case of the World Trade Center, the intact building below should have at least braked the fall of the upper stories. This did not happen. There was no measurable friction at all. It went the direction of most resistence without pause. The energy required to pulverize the concrete would have slowed the downward progress of the upward stories. The upward stories never reach the ground intact. There is no downward pressure of anykind on the upper half of the towers yet they disintegrated even before they ever touched the ground. No truss theory failure could ever explain that. Uniform collapse implies supplemental demolition charges and shadow government complicity. http://search.msn.com/results.asp?RS=CHECKED&Form=HM&cp=1252&v=1&q=impeach+911 "I was sitting outside the classroom waiting to go in, and I saw an airplane hit the tower..TIMELINE 8:48 AM BEFORE MEDIA COVERAGE CONCLUSION HE SAW THE FIRST PLANE HIT LIVE ON  SECURE TV BROADCAST IN THE PRIVACY OF HIS LIMO."

The 9/11 Enigma

The truth about 9/11 is obviously of central importance.

September 11, 2001: Explosives expert Van Romero is reported to say, "My opinion is, based on the videotapes, that after the airplanes hit the World Trade Center there were some explosive devices inside the buildings that caused the towers to collapse." The collapse of the buildings appears "too methodical" to be a chance result of airplanes colliding with the structures. [Albuquerque Journal, 9/11/01] However, Romero, who says he was on his way to the Pentagon to seek Pentagon funding for research when the attack hit, reverses his stance 10 days later. [Albuquerque Journal, 9/21/01] Might his need for government funding have played a role in his change of heart?

The thick white clouds near the bottom represent the further expansion of the thin sheets of high-velocity debris seen above as they combine with explosions from the floors below, creating a demolition wave that can be seen rapidly advancing down the towers.The collaspse of the tower took overall 9 seconds in all the rate of free fall which suggest the rate of resistence to be small as if the the center load beam was turn into fine powdery dust 

Major 911 Oddities Revealed In

NY Firehouse Documentary

When the above-noted fire crew and cameraman Jules Naudet arrived at

WTC\'s tower one along with other fire crews and entered the building\'s

ground floor lobby, they were to a one completely puzzled -- actually

astonished -- to find SIGNIFICANT and widespread damage to the entire

lobby area; although NOT of a deep, structural kind. Moreover, NOWHERE was

there ANY indication whatsoever of an incendiary-type explosion or ANY

kind of fire in this area. As one put it: \"The lobby

looked like the plane hit the lobby!\"

But it DIDN\'T: it hit EIGHTY STORIES ABOVE. There is NO WAY the impact of

the jet caused such widespread damage eighty stories below.  (OBVIOUSLY by \"certain\" federal officials)

that the lobby damage occurred because \"burning jet fuel\" had poured

eighty stories down the elevator shafts and then exploded in the lobby.

Interesting fable -- but in fact there was not one SINGLE visible

indication of ANY kind of burning, fire or incendiary-type explosion in

the lobby area.

According to this visual evidence, it is OBVIOUS and irrefutable that

OTHER EXPLOSIVES (apparently of a non-incendiary kind such as concussion

bombs) HAD ALREADY BEEN DETONATED in the lower levels of tower one at the

same time as the plane crash -- before ANY fire crews and rescue workers

arrived at the scene!

ALL the hundreds of professional firefighters massing at tower one AND

their chiefs and superiors -- a number of whom had eye-witnessed the

plane\'s actual impact -- along with other emergency services personnel

familiar with and trained to deal with such disasters, were VERY surprised

to find that EVERY SINGLE ONE of the north tower\'s elevators was OUT OF

COMMISSION. Despite the obvious severity of the impact and the ensuing

explosion and fire in parts of the building eighty stories above, these

professional firefighters and rescue workers were at a loss to explain how

EVERY SINGLE elevator could have been knocked out. Clearly, SOMETHING ELSE

besides the plane crash was responsible for this truly dangerous state of

affairs, which was a big factor in the large number of fatalities which

ensued.

Explosions of varying loudness can be heard going off repeatedly

throughout tower one during the time fire crews had set up their command

post there after the first attack. WHAT WAS CAUSING THESE EXPLOSIONS? This

is never even commented upon: but what else is there to SAY about this

other than OTHER EXPLOSIVE DEVICES were DEFINITELY being detonated

throughout the building after the plane had hit?!

ALL firefighters and rescue workers and their superiors and chiefs were

FULLY CONFIDENT at ALL TIMES -- even after the attack on the south tower

but before its unimaginable and unprecedented collapse -- that the

dwindling conflagrations on the upper levels of the twin towers WOULD be

fully contained, and that the majority of those people still up there

WOULD be brought to safety. These trained and experienced professionals

were FULLY aware of the extent and severity of the damage and destruction;

yet not ONE of them even remotely envisioned something as catastrophic as

the TOTAL, UTTER COLLAPSE of these two behemoth, tremendously solid

structures. They knew they had a tough job to do -- and they KNEW -- every

one of them -- that they COULD do it.

But then something they could never, ever have imagined DID happen. The

buildings -- beginning strangely enough with the far less damaged and last

to be struck south tower -- crumbled and sank from the Manhattan skyline

in a vast and truly apocalyptic cloud of dust and rubble.

** Ninth

The south tower, which suffered far less damage than tower one, somehow or

other crumpled to the ground. Professional fire and rescue workers on-site

were in a state of near-total disbelief. THIS COULD NOT HAVE BEEN CAUSED

BY THE PLANE CRASH!

And THEN the same thing happened to the north tower.

And even MORE unbelievable: other than 3-4 inch thick steel beams jutting

out everywhere which showed NO sign at all of having become softened,

melted or anything similar, there was literally NOTHING LEFT of these

gargantuan structures but DUST.

Moreover: EACH of the Trade Center\'s twin towers had a TWO HUNDRED

THOUSAND+ GALLON water tank atop it. That\'s nearly a HALF-MILE gallons of

water atop those two buildings. And not a single drop of it reached the

ground.

In the words of Engine 7\'s Joe Casaliggi: \"You have two 110-story office

buildings. You don\'t find a desk; you don\'t find a chair; you don\'t

find a telephone or a computer... . The biggest piece of a telephone was

half of a keypad.

\"There was nothing left of those buildings BUT DUST.\"

And we\'re supposed to believe that was caused by burning jet fuel --

THAT\'S BASICALLY KEROSENE, folks -- which had LONG SINCE burned off in

the initial fireballs.

We don\'t believe it. And neither do MANY, MANY other people, including a

large number of New York City firefighters -- may God bless them for their

selfless, honorable and heartfelt efforts to save others; all tragically

sacrificed to further the demonic and hellish agendas of the

mass-murdering within the US government so DEEPLY, deeply complicit in the

carnage of 9.11.

THE TRAITORS IN OUR GOVERNMENT WILL PAY FOR THEIR VICIOUS AND INHUMAN

TREACHERY ON 9.11.